Top-down and bottom-up approaches to health care quality: the impacts of regulation and report cards. | Academic Article individual record
abstract

The high cost of the US health care system does not buy uniformly high quality of care. Concern about low quality has prompted two major types of public policy responses: regulation, a top-down approach, and report cards, a bottom-up approach. Each can result in either functional provider responses, which increase quality, or dysfunctional responses, which may lower quality. What do we know about the impacts of these two policy approaches to quality? To answer this question, we review the extant literature on regulation and report cards. We find evidence of both functional and dysfunctional effects. In addition, we identify the areas in which additional research would most likely be valuable.

authors
publication outlet

Annu Rev Public Health

author list (cited authors)
Mukamel, D. B., Haeder, S. F., & Weimer, D. L.
publication date
2014
publisher
Annual Reviews Publisher
keywords
  • Policy
  • Government Regulation
  • Quality Improvement
  • Benchmarking
  • Nursing Homes
  • Humans
  • Personnel Staffing And Scheduling
  • Health Facility Administration
  • Quality Of Health Care
  • Quality Indicators, Health Care
  • Patient Preference
  • Medicaid
  • United States
  • Homes For The Aged
PubMed ID
24159921
identifier
660920SE
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
start page
477
end page
497
volume
35
issue
1