A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of osteoarticular brucellosis | Academic Article individual record
abstract

BACKGROUND: Infection of bones and joints remains one of the most commonly described complications of brucellosis in humans and is predominantly reported in all ages and sexes in high-risk regions, such as the Middle East, Asia, South and Central America, and Africa. We aimed to systematically review the literature and perform a meta-analysis to estimate the global prevalence of osteoarticular brucellosis (OAB). METHODOLOGY: Major bibliographic databases were searched using keywords and suitable combinations. All studies reporting the incidence and clinical manifestations of osteoarticular brucellosis in humans, and demonstrated by two or more diagnostic methods (bacteriological, molecular, serological, and/or radiographic) were included. Random model was used, and statistical significance was set at 0.05. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A total of 56 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. There was an evidence of geographical variation in the prevalence of osteoarticular disease with estimates ranging from 27% in low-risk regions to 36% in high-risk regions. However, the difference was not significant. Thus, brucellosis patients have at least a 27% chance of developing osteoarticular disease. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of OAB is not dependent on the endemicity of brucellosis in a particular region. Hence, further research should investigate the potential mechanisms of OAB, as well as the influence of age, gender, and other socioeconomic factor variations in its global prevalence, as this may provide insight into associated exposure risks and management of the disease.

author list (cited authors)
Adetunji, S. A., Ramirez, G., Foster, M. J., & Arenas-Gamboa, A.
publication date
2019
keywords
  • Topography, Medical
  • Incidence
  • Global Health
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Risk Assessment
  • Prevalence
  • Brucellosis
  • Humans
altmetric score

1.25

citation count

9