Why environmental and resource economists should care about non-expected utility models | Academic Article individual record
abstract

Experimental and theoretical analysis has shown that the conventional expected utility (EU) and subjective expected utility (SEU) models, which are linear in probabilities, have serious limitations in certain situations. We argue here that these limitations are often highly relevant to the work that environmental and natural resource economists do. We discuss some of the experimental evidence and alternatives to the SEU. We consider the theory used, the problems studied, and the methods employed by resource economists. Finally, we highlight some recent work that has begun to use some of the alternatives to the EU and SEU frameworks and discuss areas where much future work is needed. © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

author list (cited authors)
Shaw, W. D., & Woodward, R. T.
publication date
2008
publisher
Elsevier BV Publisher
published in
keywords
  • Environmental EconomicsExpected UtilityRiskUncertainty